Which is it? NYT's Andrew Revkin calls Arctic ice gains in 2009 'essentially meaningless' -- But suggested Arctic ice loss in 2007 was 'irreversible' visit site

Friday, September 18, 2009By Marc Morano – Climate Depot

Comments

0

Print

Filed under: arctic, ice, science, media, key

You have been warned! Watch 'Green Police' Ad during Super Bowl
More Shame: UN IPCC's Gate Du Jour: Aussie Droughtgate -- 'another issue with non peer reviewed World Wildlife Fund reports'
The (Warming) Empire Strikes Back: Obama to form new US climate change agency -- One-stop shopping on climate information
'Democratic Climate Revolt Against the EPA's Anti Carbon Crusade': 'Opposition is building among senior Democrats'
WSJ: UN IPCC faces 'a call for an investigation of its conduct and for its chairman to resign amid continuing criticism of the scientific basis of its reports'
GLOBAL WARMING TO BECOME GLOBAL COOLING, CLAIMS EXPERT -- Predictis 'global temps will fall by about 0.5C by 2050'
The Climate Establishment's Funds: 'The alarmist cause is considerably better funded'
UN IPCC climate panel faces another desertion – its own past chair!
Paper: 'Striking parallels between BBC's coverage of global warming and the activities of its pension fund'
Australian Herald Sun: The UN IPCC scandals: yet another coverup -- 'Can the IPCC's 2007 stink any higher?'
Science magazine confused about who is a 'prominent climate scientist' -- 'there is no specific climate discipline'
The Great IPCC Meltdown Continues
UK Telegraph: Met Office blocked role of leading scientist in climate change row
UK Daily Mail: How Met Office blocked questions on its own man's role in 'hockey stick' climate row
UK Times: Top British scientist says UN climate panel is losing credibility