'So, the argument is that we should adopt policies that are most likely to fuel the highest priority causes of civil wars (chaos/political) while allegedly addressing the lowest priority problem (climate change) via the least effective means (windmills). And they wonder why the climate change policy proposals fail'

Bye Bye 'Climate War' Claims! 'The primary causes of civil war are political, not environmental, and although environmental conditions may change with future warming, general correlates of conflicts and wars are likely to prevail'

Paging Sen. Boxer, Sen. Kerry, etc. See Climate Depot's archive. Laugh at claims of a 'national security threat' from man-made global warming here.

Peer-Reviewed Study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 'challenges previous assumptions that environmental disasters, such as drought and prolonged heat waves, had played a part in triggering unrest'

'Food shortages severe enough to spark civil turmoil or force hordes of starving nomads to swoop down from the Mongolian steppes were consistently linked to long periods of colder weather...periods of stability and prosperity occurred during sustained warm spells'

Climatologist Pielke Sr. Slams: 'Another Example Of Overstepping The Scientific Method...emphasizes why we need to change from the top-down global climate model driven focus on social and environmental risks, to the bottom-up, resource based focus on food, water, energy, human health and ecosystem function'